Everybody has irrational things that they believe on some level, even if they have a reasonable amount of evidence to the contrary.
One of my things, for example, is that I believe that I could be a doctor. I admit this could boil down to an incomprehensible level of ignorance on my part, but I have my reasons.
The evidence of my eyes, and that is where most people’s reasoning about the world comes from, is that doctors don’t really need to know anything. This is because most people’s experience with doctors is that they sit in a room for what feels like a rudely lengthy amount of time, a somewhat non-chalant guy comes in the room, you tell him your symptoms, he postulates some theories, and then LEAVES THE ROOM. Then, after another amount of time, he reenters the room and tells you what he thinks is going on. Granted, he might check your ears or blood pressure before he leaves, but my main issue is that he leaves the room for a while and returns with his final analysis. How is he not just looking up my symptoms online? From my experience, I have no reason to believe that he does anything other than that, and that is why I think I could be a doctor.
“But what about the years of school? Doctors need so much schooling to get where they are, how could you possibly be a doctor without the training?” – You may ask. Well, I understand where that’s coming from, but that’s where my irrational belief really shows itself. Because I don’t think they need that training. A basic understanding of the human body will help, but if you’re just looking up symptoms online, then the main skill you need is to accurately search things up and parse through the information online. And yes, you have to be very good at that, but you don’t need that much medical expertise. Maybe it takes a real doctor to deal with big problems, such as cancer, but if people come in with the flu or stomache aches, and can tell me how they fell, I reckon I could handle it.
Sounds ridiculous right? I must sound like a real ignorant moron right now. But I don’t think I’m alone in that. I think you have beliefs that are just as nonsensical as mine. Everybody does. If you’re honest with yourself, you might even be able to name a few.
For example, you are prejudiced. That’s not an insult, that’s a fact of life. Everybody is prejudiced towards some sort of people. That’s not that bad if you realize it. The problems of prejudice come from when you honestly don’t believe that you are prejudiced, that every judgment you make about people is well-informed, and that you are not guilty of that which you criticize others about. That’s where real evil comes from because if you recognize that you are prejudiced, you understand that your assessments are not necessarily cognizant of reality, and you don’t take actions to enforce your will on others or preoccupy your brain with negative thoughts.
That’s not to say that everyone ought to love each other all the time no matter what. That is a disgusting rhetoric, and it’s exactly what I would want people to believe if I was a disgusting person.
If you claim that you love everyone, regardless of who they are, what you are really saying is that your love has no value, that it takes nothing to earn your love, that you do not respect your Self, that you have low expectations for humanity, and that you actually love no one.
The biggest heart of the matter here is not loving your Self. I believe everything follows from that. If you love yourself then, necessarily, you would not disrespect your love by giving it to the undeserving because that would be insulting your Self. You would not insult people who you love, not purposefully anyways, so why would you do it to yourself? Hence, if you love your Self, then you do not give out your love unwittingly to those that you see as undeserving of it.
I think this is one of the many things that people do not hear these days. I am young and so I will not entertain whether this was always an issue or not, I have no idea. But I believe it stands today that people are subconsciously taught that their love has no value and that they ought to love everyone. This is true at least in the Western world that is built namely on Christian principles, in which “loving your enemy” is told to be virtuous. It is anything but. You should not love your enemy and, if you think that you should, what does that doctrine say about your friends? If you are to love your enemies and your friends, then you are saying that you regard your friends as just the same as your enemies. That doesn’t sound very friendly to me.
I could have this wrong too, the big book does not specifically say that you ought to love your enemies just as much as your friends (not to my knowledge anyways) but only that you ought to love your enemies. It may be virtuous, according to the big book, that you love your enemies but love your friends a hundred times as much. In which case, I would say that is a less evil doctrine, but still one that devalues your love to the extent that you would categorize the people you hold in the highest regard with those in the lowest. You are worth more than that.
You are flawed though. For all that I talk about how humanity is the closest thing to Gods that you and I are aware of, that does not mean people are perfect. Throughout all of history, there have been Gods or God-like figures that represent or embody evil in some sense. The remarkable thing about that, is that it’s up to you which one you get to be. I think people can be a great force for good if they so choose. That is hard though, I know that. But it can be figured out through reasoning.
People do not have claws or fangs or remarkable muscles, but they have a mind and, through that mind, they have survived for as long as history. It stands that your capacity to reason is exactly what is keeping you alive and for what? Why should you be alive? You live and you use your mind to ascribe values to the experiences you have. If you haven’t killed yourself yet, then you know on some level that you are capable of dictating whether something is good or bad, heaven or hell. Being alive then, is something that is good, even if it is comprised of bad experiences. Suffering, I have said before, is inescapable. Everyone probably knows that. But they use their minds to try to reduce the amount of suffering and maximize the amount of pleasure they have in life. In some sense, we think like Utilitarians. But where the classical Utilitarians go wrong, is that they deal out the cards of utility to everyone equally or, if not, then they still place to much emphasis on other people’s utility.
The truth is that your utility, your happiness, counts for everything. A complete strangers does not count. That might sound selfish. It is. There’s no reason to apologize for it either. And you will see why.
Imagine that you are walking home one day and not in any particular rush. Also, imagine that it is January and you live in Canada. This might be easier for some to imagine than others. Now, on your way to your igloo, you notice that someone’s car is pointed perpendicular to the sidewalk. You hear the roar of their engine and see their tires spinning but it’s all futile. The driver then unrolls his window and asks if you can push his car.
If you take what I’ve said above, that a strangers utility or pleasure counts for nothing, then you might infer that you have no reason or obligation to help this guy get his car unstuck. You would be wrong, however. But it is correct that you have no obligation. Rarely are you ever obligated to someone else unless you’ve made a promise (in which case it’s more accurately an obligation to your Self anyways). But you might have a reason to help this guy get his car unstuck. That is whether you are willing to make the trade of your time for helping another person with their problem. There are plenty of ways of looking about this.
First, you will feel good after helping this guy get unstuck from the snow. This is true of every person everywhere from my experience, and this is often reason enough for people to help. Also, you won’t feel good if you don’t help this guy get unstuck. You will get an extra five minutes to do with whatever you please, but if you weigh that against the feeling you get after helping this guy, then I think it’s clear how the scale tips.
Second, this guy might not be a stranger. He is, in this scenario, but what if he doesn’t remain that way? After all, you live close to where he was driving, what if you were later in a similar scenario and asked him a favour? If he remembers you, he might not be so inclined to help you out. People older than infants have a remarkable capability to sacrifice immediate pleasure for their future. That’s what you do when you save money or, more simply, when you go to work. There is another reason to help this guy out.
Finally, even as antisocial as you are, you probably don’t value your five minutes more than this guy values his five minutes. He’s probably looking to go somewhere important. Now, that doesn’t factor into your decision, and it certainly doesn’t obligate you, but you are implicitly making a trade off here and might ask your Self what you would like in that scenario. For all the slave-morality that is taught in the big book “Treat people as you want to be treated” is sometimes good advice. It is sometimes not good advice, but I can get into that another time. I have a lifetime to be writing this anyways.
Notice that in no scenario do I mention the obligation to help this guy out. I don’t say that you have a duty to stand there and push his car, nor do I say that you are less of a good person if you neglect to help.
What I am saying that, in your selfishness, you can still reason that it is better for you to help people, even strangers who you know nothing about. Snakelike people like to claim that “people are social animals” (usually for the purposes of imposing their will on you) but that is only half of the story. People are also anti-social animals. Be honest with yourself, and you’ll know that to be just as true, if not more so, than “people are social animals.” But telling the truth is usually not a good way of manipulating people into doing what you want them to do.
To get political, although this really shouldn’t be a hot topic, that is why capitalism works. If you allow a system for people to work for their own benefit, then they will benefit others because that is the reasonable thing to do. The proof is in the pudding. I am not typing this on a machine created for the benefit of other people; you are not going to bed tonight under a roof put there for your sake; you don’t go to work for the purpose of your clients or customers. Obviously, people can be unreasonable, usually if they are too lazy to think, and the consequences of that are terrible, but that is a result of humanity and is not a consequence of allowing people the right to self-determination and the right to free trade.
That is why I say that people are selfish and that is a GOOD thing. Thank God that the people who built the house you are sleeping in were selfish and self-motivated, otherwise they wouldn’t have bothered to create your bedroom.